|

What's this I read in the papers about QAM closing?
It has been decided by the Caloundra City Council and the Queensland
Government that Caloundra Airport will be closed when current
leases expire in 2014. It is intended that airport tenants will
relocate to a replacement airport to be constructed on a remote
location which is yet to be determined. Although it is desirable
that QAM be located on an operational airport, it is imperative
that the Museum be located in a prominent position which is visible
and accessible to tourists. For this reason, QAM wishes to remain
on its present site after the airport closes. Whilst QAM has received
unofficial indications that special provisions will be made for
the Museum, there has been no official undertaking. This has led
to speculation that QAM might have to close.
Why
doesn't the Museum accept that its lease has run out and just
move on like other airport businesses will have to do?
QAM was invited to come to Caloundra by the Council
of the day. Caloundra had to compete with several other locations
which also wanted the Museum. When QAM accepted the Council's
invitation to come to Caloundra, the main condition placed on
the Museum was that it be run as a business. Despite the fact
that QAM is clearly not your average business, this obligation
has been fulfilled consistently. The Museum is self-sufficient,
but only because it has access to tourism. QAM prides itself on
the fact that it does not owe anyone any money. The Museum pays
its bills on time and has modest financial reserves. However,
these financial reserves will not extend to moving the entire
Museum.
Is
it possible to move the Queensland Air Museum?
The good people who create museums do so with one fundamental
objective in mind - perpetuity. In an imperfect universe, this
may be unachievable, but it has to be the goal of every museum.
Certainly this is how it was when the Queensland Air Museum was
created in 1974, for this objective had formed in the minds of
QAM's founders several years earlier when the embryonic organisation
had literally nothing - no home and no exhibits. Aircraft Exhibit
Number 1, Canberra A84-225, came long before it had a permanent
home. Indeed, this aeroplane was moved to no fewer than three
temporary sites in the Brisbane area before it had a permanent
home. This permanent home was and is Caloundra.
Although there had been offers from three other locations, QAM
accepted an invitation from the Council of the day to relocate
to Caloundra. In 1986, what was a Brisbane-based organisation,
packed up and moved to Caloundra confident in the knowledge that
an invitation from the Council of the day was assurance of a permanent
home. QAM committed itself totally to Caloundra. Thus, the Canberra
and the Museum which was growing up around it, has been moved
on four separate occasions, each with an exponentially increasing
degree of difficulty. All of these moves were undertaken by the
Museum's own volunteer members but the degree of difficulty is
now such that the members cannot contemplate a fifth move.
When the Museum relocated to Caloundra, it brought with it three
aeroplanes, only one of which was in display condition. Local
enthusiasts gravitated to the Museum and all aeroplanes were soon
fit for display. Twenty years later, this collection of three
aeroplanes has grown to forty.
In any contemplation of moving the Museum, it needs to be understood
how these 40 aeroplanes came to be at Caloundra. Certainly none
of them flew in and even more certainly, none will fly out. They
all had to be dismantled and trucked in, one at a time over a
twenty year period! Almost without exception, these aircraft were
in a damaged or deteriorated condition when acquired by QAM and
therefore it did not matter greatly if there were a few scratches
and dents incurred during the process. It was a relatively uncomplicated
operation to place a dismantled aircraft on old tyres and lash
it to a truck, but it was still a job for experienced specialists.
Any proposal to relocate the Museum needs to recognise that another
move will not be so straightforward. There are now 40 aircraft
to be moved in a compressed time frame. Almost all of these aircraft
have now been painstakingly restored, which means that old tyres
are no longer an acceptable form of packing. If these aircraft
are to be moved, they will need to be carefully dismantled and
placed in custom engineered transport cradles. These cradles currently
do not exist. Dismantled sections of aircraft will need to be
bubble-wrapped to protect new paint. All of this work will have
to be performed by experienced specialists - if they can be found.
Whether or not this work will be performed by QAM members is problematic.
To a man, they all thought that they were moving each aeroplane
for the last time to a permanent home. Remembering that all are
volunteers and many are seniors, it is most unlikely that any
of them will be willing to undo their years of effort. Any plan
to move the Museum will need to be predicated on the use of paid
professionals.
If it is decided that the Museum is to be relocated, there has
to be a suitable site available. Such a site must:
| (a) |
Be easily accessible and visible to tourists. In its current
location, the Museum is self-sufficient. Move it away from
the tourist flow and the Museum will perish. |
| (b) |
Be equal to or greater in area than the current 2 hectare
site. |
| (c) |
Be made available to the Museum for a token rental or preferably
freehold. |
| (d) |
Be fully developed with buildings, hardstand, fencing and
infrastructure of an equivalent standard to the current site.
Moving the collection to a vacant lot in the middle of nowhere
is totally unacceptable and will not be allowed to happen. |
One
important aspect of QAM that must be understood is that the Museum
does not belong to any individual or group of individuals. The
entire collection is deemed to be held in trust for the entire
community. QAM is not your average business intended to make a
profit and pay wages. Although it is run very efficiently as a
business would be, there are no paid staff and nobody derives
any income from it. QAM exists as it is because it was invited
to come to Caloundra by the Council of the day. It belongs to
the community. Members who may have devoted the greater part of
their lives and in some cases a significant part of their income
to QAM, will take nothing with them should they ever leave and
there will be no bequests to assist surviving families as members
pass away. Although they have probably never considered it, all
of the members can simply walk away from the Museum if they choose.
So
what would it cost to move the Museum?
The escalation of land prices in the rapid growth of S.E. Queensland,
and general inflation in material, wages, and services, means
that relocation costs are now approaching $10m. Remember, before
anyone can relocate QAM, they will need to build a new museum
facility before any relocation of exhibits will be contemplated.
QAM cannot afford to relocate and it is doubtful if the ratepayers
of Caloundra would be prepared to fund the relocation, nor should
they be required to. Any relocation costs should rightly fall
to those who stand to profit from the closure of Caloundra Airport.
Should it be decided to move the Museum, the safe dismantling
and packing of aircraft and other exhibits would demand that the
Museum be closed to the public for health and safety reasons.
This would deprive the Museum of income for many weeks, possibly
months. This situation would then be repeated at the new site.
In addition to the estimated $10M it would cost to relocate the
Museum, there is another cost which is already accruing. The ongoing
prevarication over the future of the Museum is already having
a negative impact on the health and wellbeing of QAM members,
many of whom are in their retirement and hoping to leave a lasting
contribution to their community. Until such time as there is resolution
of the Museum's future, these citizens are being rewarded with
the stress of knowing that their years of work might have been
in vain.
This ongoing speculation is also restricting the development of
the Museum. There is a need for a third hangar but this cannot
be contemplated while there is doubt over the Museum's tenure.
Let the QAM flourish where it is.
Version
3 - 08 January 2010
The above
text is extracted from a 20 page document titled Your Air
Museum. Love it or Lose it. The complete document can
be downloaded as a PDF by clicking here.
You
will need to have Adobe Reader installed on your computer to read
the document. Click the following link for a free download.

Download the Reader from adobe.com
|